VIRGINIA LEGISLATURE MAKES MAJOR CHANGES TO ALIMONY, SEPARATION AGREEMENTS,
FOSTER CARE, CHILD SUPPORT
Article by John Crouch, Attorney at Law, Crouch
& Crouch, Arlington, Virginia; (703) 528-6700;
Originally Published in Family Law News, a Va. State Bar Publication
The 1998 General Assembly adjourned in mid-March. It enacted
Rehabilitative Alimony, changed standards for Termination of Parental rights,
and made changes in how child support is computed and awarded.
WHAT PASSED
Rehabilitative Alimony -- On separate web
page
Separation Agreements, Reconciliation, and the Premarital Agreement Act
The bill originally would have amended the introductory section of the Premarital
Agreements Act to make clear that the Act does not cover Separation Agreements.
The substituted version, in contrast, omits that statement and actually
adds to the Act a substantive provision about Separation Agreements, in
the section on post-marital agreements! What it says is that reconciliation
nullifies the not-yet-performed portions of a Separation Agreement unless
the Agreement expressly says otherwise.
Foster Care & Termination Reforms
Substitute SB 388 limits the requirement that foster care plans aim at attempting
"family reunification," by specifying that the child's health
and safety is "the paramount concern," and limiting family reunification
to "reasonable efforts" "if consistent with the child's health
and safety." It also says courts must not require agencies to make
reunification efforts if the parent has had rights to another child terminated,
or if the parent has been convicted of felonious assault resulting in severe
injury to a child of the parent or one whom the parent lived with, or of
the homicide of such a child or the other parent. It makes clear that the
JDR Court always keeps its jurisdiction over children in these cases, and
lets JDR judges issue protective orders sua sponte in any case before them.
Child Support Changes
H 717 says that courts may order either party to let the other party take
the dependency exemption. This bill is a substitute for one that would have
made all support orders include a discussion of tax consequences in their
mandatory §20-60.3 language.
H 1256 (substituted version) gives parents credit for disability benefits
that are paid on the child's behalf and that were counted as gross income.
If the credit exceeds obligations it can be counted against arrearages or
even future obligations.
In postponing consideration of the bill defining a "day" for the
purpose of the shared custody support guidelines, the Assembly formally
asked the Virginia Bar Association Coalition on Family Law to conduct a
study of the issue (HJR 141). This is also a first. The Coalition is a lobbying
group of representatives from practically every lawyer group in the state
that has something to do with family law, including the Virginia Women Attorneys
Association, some local bar groups, and the Southern Poverty Law Center.
(The VSB does not participate in the Coalition's lobbying activities, however.)
The Assembly also passed H 1054, reiterating that the Guidelines apply to
pendente lite support ordered under §20-103 just as in any other support
case.
POSTPONED TO NEXT YEAR
·Define "day" as "overnight" for purposes of shared-custody
support guidelines. The VBA Coalition is authorized to study the issue.
·Replace UCCJA with the new Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and
Enforcement Act (see article in next issue)
·Mandatory makeup visitation with loss of custody for three visitation
order violations
·Covenant marriage
·Requiring mutual consent for some no-fault divorces
·Sending divorcing parents to mandatory programs on effects of divorce
·English-style joint parenting plans
·Presumption of joint parental responsibility
·"Imminent harm" standard for awarding custody to non-parent
·Fines and criminalization of employers not complying with Payroll
Withholding Orders
·Replace "best interests" with "needs"
·Replace terms "custodial," "non-custodial," "custody,"
"joint custody" and "visitation" with "sole parenting,"
"shared parenting," and "parenting arrangements" as
in England (see Summer 1993 FLN, p. 15)
·Letting attorneys issue subpoenas, which was endorsed by the Boyd-Graves
conference.
WHAT WAS KILLED
Termination of Parental Rights reforms, which would allow juries, make JDR
a court of record, and appeal straight to Court of Appeals instead of de
novo to Circuit Court.
Child Care costs in Guidelines to include any costs of employment, of job
searching, education and training (!?). Guidelines to factor in value of
tax exemptions and credits for children, which courts must allocate or alternate
between parties.
Requiring siblings, grandparents and legal guardians to report suspected
abuse or neglect.
Crouch
& Crouch home page | Family
Law Information | Family
Law Articles Index
Disclaimer: Items are not to be considered legal advice or to create
any lawyer-client relationship. Most articles include some obsolete information.
In addition, taking any legal information out of context, i.e., using it
in a different court or a subtly different kind of case, or without the
training to understand all of what it means or doing research to verify
it, usually has disastrous consequences.