Judges' Discretion


Family Law Articles || Crouch & Crouch Main Page

FAMILY LAW Article by Richard Crouch, Attorney at Law, Crouch & Crouch, Arlington, Virginia; (703) 528-6700;
Originally Published in Family Law News, a Va. State Bar Publication, Vol. 15 No. 3 (Fall, 1995)

Disclaimer: Items are not to be considered legal advice or to create any lawyer-client relationship. Most articles include some obsolete information. In addition, taking any legal information out of context, i.e., using it in a different court or a subtly different kind of case, or without the training to understand all of what it means or doing research to verify it, usually has disastrous consequences.
This month's Chairman's Message ["A Day In Juvenile Court"] is perhaps for some readers a refreshing departure from the usual stuff about plans and projects, commitments to excellence, and obligatory obeisance to the powers that be that chairmen are usually obligated to grind out. It should give us something real to think about. Section Chair Carol Gravitt's holiday-season message is also something more: it voices an idea that is being heard increasingly these days, both within the Section leadership and without. That is that much as we may distrust, and even dislike, our trial judges at times, it is not the worst thing that can happen in family law if the trial judge is allowed to exercise a little wisdom and discretion. That is, it is just possible that five-page property statues and nine- page support statutes that attempt to tie the trial judge's hands in every way are no better in the end than the old law that trusted in a judge's wisdom do what seems right, and perhaps get it "wrong" no more than half the time.

An inevitable outgrowth of such statutes is the kind of multi-page form order very lucidly explicated in this issue's lead article by Fairfax practitioner Richard Byrd. Also dedicated to the task of helping practitioners make their way through a statutory maze is the practice note on the juvenile justice system contributed by Arlington practitioner John Wasowicz, author of another article on how you and your calculator may just possibly make sense of the statutory formulae in Code Section 20-108.2. For those ready for something completely different, new Board of Governors member David Masterman has contributed an article on prime-time (apparently an important distinction there) television's portrayal of marriage and divorce. The astonishing volume of David's accomplishment in the field of marathon TV-viewing certainly shows us that not all family lawyers are overworked these days.

As the season of joy and good will is upon us, or at least it is by the time people get their newsletters, let us all confront the various outrages in this quarter's issue with a certain sense of forbearance, perspective, generosity of spirit and largeness of mind.
Crouch & Crouch home page | Family Law Information | Family Law Articles Index

Disclaimer: Items are not to be considered legal advice or to create any lawyer-client relationship. Most articles include some obsolete information. In addition, taking any legal information out of context, i.e., using it in a different court or a subtly different kind of case, or without the training to understand all of what it means or doing research to verify it, usually has disastrous consequences.