Judges' Discretion
Family Law Articles || Crouch
& Crouch Main Page
FAMILY LAW Article by Richard
Crouch, Attorney at Law, Crouch & Crouch,
Arlington, Virginia; (703) 528-6700;
Originally Published in Family Law News, a Va. State Bar Publication,
Vol. 15 No. 3 (Fall, 1995)
Disclaimer: Items are not to be considered legal advice or to create
any lawyer-client relationship. Most articles include some obsolete information.
In addition, taking any legal information out of context, i.e., using it
in a different court or a subtly different kind of case, or without the
training to understand all of what it means or doing research to verify
it, usually has disastrous consequences.
This month's Chairman's Message ["A Day In Juvenile Court"]
is perhaps for some readers a refreshing departure from the usual stuff
about plans and projects, commitments to excellence, and obligatory obeisance
to the powers that be that chairmen are usually obligated to grind out.
It should give us something real to think about. Section Chair Carol Gravitt's
holiday-season message is also something more: it voices an idea that is
being heard increasingly these days, both within the Section leadership
and without. That is that much as we may distrust, and even dislike, our
trial judges at times, it is not the worst thing that can happen in family
law if the trial judge is allowed to exercise a little wisdom and discretion.
That is, it is just possible that five-page property statues and nine- page
support statutes that attempt to tie the trial judge's hands in every way
are no better in the end than the old law that trusted in a judge's wisdom
do what seems right, and perhaps get it "wrong" no more than half
the time.
An inevitable outgrowth of such statutes is the kind of multi-page form
order very lucidly explicated in this issue's lead article by Fairfax practitioner
Richard Byrd. Also dedicated to the task of helping practitioners make their
way through a statutory maze is the practice note on the juvenile justice
system contributed by Arlington practitioner John Wasowicz, author of another
article on how you and your calculator may just possibly make sense of the
statutory formulae in Code Section 20-108.2. For those ready for something
completely different, new Board of Governors member David Masterman has
contributed an article on prime-time (apparently an important distinction
there) television's portrayal of marriage and divorce. The astonishing volume
of David's accomplishment in the field of marathon TV-viewing certainly
shows us that not all family lawyers are overworked these days.
As the season of joy and good will is upon us, or at least it is by the
time people get their newsletters, let us all confront the various outrages
in this quarter's issue with a certain sense of forbearance, perspective,
generosity of spirit and largeness of mind.
Crouch &
Crouch home page | Family
Law Information | Family
Law Articles Index
Disclaimer: Items are not to be considered legal advice or to create
any lawyer-client relationship. Most articles include some obsolete information.
In addition, taking any legal information out of context, i.e., using it
in a different court or a subtly different kind of case, or without the
training to understand all of what it means or doing research to verify
it, usually has disastrous consequences.